The article under consideration is headlined "Reality and Fantasy: Desire Blurs the Line".It is published on the website of the newspaper "The New York Times" on April 18,2013.The author of of the article is Scott O.A.In the current article the author told about the new movie of François Ozon.The name of the film is “In the House.”
The author describes the main character Germain,who is a high school teacher.He attends a Woody Allen movie with his wife, Jeanne, a gallerist played by Kristin Scott Thomas. Though the movie is clear enough that Germain might be one of his lost alter egos, a character ensnared by his own desires and a willful inability to distinguish reality from fantasy.
The author stresses that based on a play by the Spanish writer Juan Mayorga, “In the House” weaves a pleasant and clever spell, manipulating the viewer much in the way that Claude plays with Germain.The viewers are never quite sure if the boy is writing truth or fiction — the scenes he composes are no less “real” than anything else in the movie — or whether the remarkable events he reports are embellishments or outright inventions.
The author of the article underlined that the dexterity of the actors and their director is not quite enough, and as “In the House” accelerates, it also starts to sputter, piling on incidents and revelations that cause its web of implications to unravel.
The article reports that if you are like the main character that might drive you crazy; if not, you might just start to feel tired.
Having read the article I would like to watch this film,to my mind it is very contradictory.
The author describes the main character Germain,who is a high school teacher.He attends a Woody Allen movie with his wife, Jeanne, a gallerist played by Kristin Scott Thomas. Though the movie is clear enough that Germain might be one of his lost alter egos, a character ensnared by his own desires and a willful inability to distinguish reality from fantasy.
The author stresses that based on a play by the Spanish writer Juan Mayorga, “In the House” weaves a pleasant and clever spell, manipulating the viewer much in the way that Claude plays with Germain.The viewers are never quite sure if the boy is writing truth or fiction — the scenes he composes are no less “real” than anything else in the movie — or whether the remarkable events he reports are embellishments or outright inventions.
The author of the article underlined that the dexterity of the actors and their director is not quite enough, and as “In the House” accelerates, it also starts to sputter, piling on incidents and revelations that cause its web of implications to unravel.
The article reports that if you are like the main character that might drive you crazy; if not, you might just start to feel tired.
Having read the article I would like to watch this film,to my mind it is very contradictory.
It will be better if you put the link to the website of "The New York Times" into the word "website".
ОтветитьУдалитьFrom my point of view you use lack of cliché, the phrases in the list how to render the article.
I am sure, that you can write more about your personal opinion concerning the article.
That's why your mark is
VERY GOOD